Volume 10, Number 1. March 2009
Editorial
1
A survey of the quality and quantity of Special Care Dentistry
teaching, including Gerodontology, in dental schools of the United
Kingdom and Ireland
F Gordon, M Z Morgan and S Thompson 3
Oral health risk assessment of adults with learning disabilities:
(1) Current practice
S Turner, T Lamont, H Chesser, L Curtice, K Gordon, S Manton, A
Martin, T Welbury and M P Sweeney 11
Oral health risk assessment of adults with learning disabilities:
(2) Attitudes of dentists and care staff
S Turner, T Lamont, H Chesser, L Curtice, K Gordon, S Manton, A
Martin, T Welbury and M P Sweeney 18
A preliminary investigation into aspects of oral health of Bangladeshi
young adults with a learning disability in Tower Hamlets
Mili Doshi, Mary Burke and Janice Fiske 25
Management of exaggerated gag reflex using conscious sedation
techniques in endodontic therapy - a pilot study
Harushi Yoshida, Tomoyuki Nogami, Yoshihiko Hayashi and Kumiko Oi
36
Locked-in syndrome: A case report
Sharon Andrea Corinne Liberali 41
Editorial
As we move through the months of the year 2009, the impact of the
global economic downturn becomes more evident and nowhere is this
felt more keenly than by those groups of people who are marginalised
in our societies: the poor, elderly and disabled and so often, these
in combination. Towards the end of 2008 it was evident that in some
countries, Ireland, Sweden, Italy and Hungary at least, there were
moves to cut benefits to people with disabilities as the economic
gloom deepened.
As resources become constrained it is also true that the services
to marginalised groups become threatened: respite care, teaching
assistants, rehabilitation programmes in prisons and comprehensive
entitlement to free healthcare by those below the poverty line,
which of course includes many people with disabilities.
At a time when the economy is in crisis, there is an ominous sense
that those who are vulnerable are left exposed by the consequences
of increasing unemployment: heightened self-interest, increasing
crime perpetuated towards such sectors of the population and an
abandonment of the move towards equity and equality for disadvantaged
groups.
At a time like this, governments must hold true to their commitment
to vulnerable populations by pursuing a reflationary approach to
infrastructure, tax cuts, for example, so that poor, elderly and
disabled people can access services and thus contribute to turning
around the parlous state in which we now find ourselves.
Oral health care services are not exempt from this. Many working
with patients will have for some time now felt the effects of revisions
to service plans and budgets, revised downwards as the economic
forecasts spelt out less money. In many countries of the world there
will be a need for persuasive arguments to make a case for the retention
of essential services for those with disabilities; in many countries
enabling legislation should ensure that equity is delivered.
It is worth pausing for a moment to underline the differences between
equity and equality, terms so often used interchangeably but with
distinct differences. What is relevant for people who are marginalised
is equity in services, ensuring that services are targeted to allow
those most disadvantaged to achieve optimal outcomes, whereas equality
implies the same for all, equally distributed. However, equality
in healthcare does not produce health for all. Health and socio-economic
status are inextricably linked and poverty continues to contribute
to poor health and chronic illness, keeping many populations below
the poverty line. Health promotion, of which oral health is a part,
is governed by the ethical principle of equity of access such that
attainment of health should not be hampered for socio-economic reasons
or poor health service delivery systems.
Now more than ever we need to keep these principles in sight as
the focus stays clearly on efficiencies and economies. Without this
not only will the goals for 2010, the European Anti-Poverty Year,
not be realised but the Millennium Development Goals for 2015 will
not be achieved by those who stand to gain the most.
June Nunn
Editor
A survey of the quality and quantity of Special Care Dentistry
teaching, including Gerodontology, in dental schools of the United
Kingdom and Ireland
F. Gordon BDS, M. Z Morgan BSc (Hons), PGCE, MPH, MPhil, FFPH ,
S. Thompson BDS, MPhil, PhD, MSND RDSEd, FHEA
School of Dentistry Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
Abstract
Aim and objectives: To investigate the Special Care Dentistry
educational programmes in undergraduate dental schools of the UK
and Ireland, and establish whether courses are adequate in fulfilling
the learning outcomes in the General Dental Council (GDC) document
'The First Five Years - A Framework for Undergraduate Dental Education'
and statements made by the Quality Assurance Agency (QAA) for Higher
Education 'Benchmarking Academic Standards: Dentistry'.
Design: A postal questionnaire survey of 15 dental schools
across the UK and Republic of Ireland. Questionnaires were distributed
to 1,220 final year students and 15 staff who co-ordinate Special
Care Dentistry teaching at each school. The questions explored areas
such as teaching methodology and student's clinical confidence with
Special Care patients.
Results: Ten dental schools returned student questionnaires
and nine returned staff questionnaires. Most did not fulfil GDC
or QAA requirements. The amount of didactic teaching and clinical
experience varied considerably. Many undergraduates felt they did
not receive adequate teaching and 87.9% did not gain sufficient
clinical experience. Undergraduates felt ill prepared to treat certain
groups of Special Care patients, especially those with mental health
problems. Of the students who considered they had enough hands-on
experience, only 22.9% felt 'confident' to carry out treatment.
Conclusions: The requirements of the GDC and the QAA are
not being met. More clinical experience is required in most dental
schools whilst in some schools, undergraduates receive none. Special
Care patients are increasingly dentally motivated and many dental
undergraduates are not adequately prepared in skills or attitude
to provide high quality care.
Oral health risk assessment of adults with learning disabilities:
(1) Current practice
S. Turner1, T. Lamont2, H Chesser2, L. Curtice3, K Gordon4, S Manton5,
A. Martin6, T. Welbury7 and M.P. Sweeney8
1Dental Health Service Research Unit; University of Dundee; 2Scottish
School of Primary Care; 3Scottish Consortium for Learning Disabilities;
4Lothian Salaried Primary Dental Care Service; 5Dundee Dental Hospital
and School; 6General Dental Practitioner; Tayside; 7Greater Glasgow
Salaried Primary Dental Care Service; 8Glasgow University Dental
School
ABSTRACT
Aims: To investigate oral health risk assessment (OHRA) practice
for adults with intellectual disabilities in Scotland.
Materials and methods: Two stage postal survey. In Phase
1, Clinical Dental Directors in all 15 Scottish Health Boards were
asked to provide any written material pertaining to OHRA for adults
with learning disabilities. In Phase 2, dentists and dentally qualified
directors and consultants were asked whether a range of 39 OHRA
elements were undertaken. These covered the following broad themes:
care scale (9 items); risk factors (16 items); follow-up (7 items);
and integration (7 items).
Results: In Phase 1, all 15 Health Board areas responded,
with eight providing written material. In Phase 2, 179 of 253 dentists
(including directors and consultants) gave information on current
OHRA practice (response rate: 71%). Items most frequently assessed
(i.e. reported by at least 50% of dentists) were: dental treatment
needs; both dental and other oral problems; urgency of treatment
need; whether examination was incomplete; diet and sugary drinks
consumption; brushing adequacy; and consent to treatment issues.
Far less frequently mentioned items related to follow-up and the
wider integration of OHRA in care planning, carer contact and support.
Dentists who saw more adults with learning disabilities tended to
report greater coverage of assessment items - particularly of risk
factors (r=0.27, n=124, p=0.002). Dentists working in areas which
had submitted written material in Phase 1 did not report more comprehensive
assessment practice.
Conclusions: Dentists' reports suggest that often OHRA was
limited to items of immediate clinical relevance rather than a comprehensive
review of risk factors or an ongoing process of risk management
in collaboration with other individuals and agencies, and that this
practice may have developed from clinician experience rather than
guidance.
Oral health risk assessment of adults with learning disabilities:
(2) Attitudes of dentists and care staff
S. Turner1, T. Lamont2, H Chesser2, L. Curtice3, K Gordon4, S Manton5,
A. Martin6, T. Welbury7 and M.P. Sweeney8
1Dental Health Service Research Unit; University of Dundee; 2Scottish
School of Primary Care; 3Scottish Consortium for Learning Disabilities;
4Lothian Salaried Primary Dental Care Service; 5Dundee Dental Hospital
and School; 6General Dental Practitioner; Tayside; 7Greater Glasgow
Salaried Primary Dental Care Service; 8Glasgow University Dental
School
ABSTRACT
Aim: To compare dentists' and care staff attitudes regarding
the importance of elements that might contribute to an oral health
risk assessment (OHRA) protocol for adults with learning disabilities
in Scotland.
Materials and methods: Postal survey of: dentists employed
in the Community Dental Service in Scotland, plus consultants and
directors as well as general dental practitioners, a sample of Care
Home staff, and other care staff. Respondents rated the importance
of 39 OHRA elements covering four themes: care (9 items); risk factors
(16 items); follow-up (7 items); and integration (7 items).
Results: Response rates were 71% (179/253) for dentists;
69% (36/ 52) for the care home sample, and 31% (10/32) for other
social care contacts. A Principle Components Analysis was used to
allocate items to four scales covering attitudes towards care issues
(e.g. communication problems), risk factors (e.g. swallowing difficulties),
follow-up (e.g. named individual responsible for follow-up), and
integration (e.g. involvement of other professionals in assessment).
Respondents in both the dental and care staff groups tended to rate
most items as important. However, care staff placed more importance
on elements in the follow-up and integration scales. Care staff
also rated the value of an ORHA tool more highly, although again,
both groups were generally positive.
Conclusion: Results suggest that care staff were in tune
with the aims of current government policy regarding development
of comprehensive and shared assessment arrangements, while dentists
tended to view assessment as a stand-alone examination. However,
the generally positive attitude towards OHRA suggests that there
is support for further development of risk assessment as an aid
to prevention and treatment planning.
A preliminary investigation into aspects of oral health of Bangladeshi
young adults with a learning disability in Tower Hamlets
Mili Doshi BDS, MFDS.RCS (Eng), Msc (SPc)1, Mary Burke BDS, FDS
RCS (Eng)2 and Janice Fiske MBE, BDS, MPhil, FDS RCS(Eng)3
1Senior Dental Officer, Tower Hamlets Community Dental Service;
2Associate Specialist in Special Care Dentistry, Guy's and St Thomas'
NHS Foundation Trust; 3Senior Lecturer/ Consultant in Special Care
Dentistry, King's College London, UK
Abstract
Aim and objectives: To investigate aspects of the oral health,
oral health awareness and oral health behaviours of Bangladeshi
young adults with a learning disability.
Design: A convenience sample of Bangladeshi young adults
with a learning disability was obtained from adult day centres in
the London Borough of Tower Hamlets. Structured interviews with
52 individuals (to establish oral health awareness, dental behaviour,
perceived needs and dental anxiety) were followed by a standardised
oral examination to establish normative dental and treatment needs.
Results: Participants were very aware of different oral health
conditions and their social implications. Aesthetics was especially
important. The mean caries experience, expressed as DMFT, was 4.49;
periodontal treatment was required by 88% of the study population;
high levels of tooth wear and dental trauma were found, 48% and
42% respectively; and severe malocclusion was found in 53%. Oral
health behaviours were unfavourable with generally poor oral hygiene,
high use of betel nut and a trend of symptom-based rather than routine
dental attendance. Women were significantly more likely to express
dental anxiety than were men, 55% and 25% respectively, and had
an overwhelming preference to see a female dentist from their own
background (73%).
Conclusion: Bangladeshi young adults with learning disabilities
have complex and unmet oral health needs.
Management of exaggerated gag reflex using conscious sedation techniques
in endodontic therapy - a pilot study
Harushi Yoshida DDS, PhD1, Tomoyuki Nogami DDS, PhD2, Yoshihiko
Hayashi DDS, PhD3, Kumiko Oi DDS, PhD4
1Associate Professor, 2Assistant Professor; Department of Special
Care Dentistry, Nagasaki University, Hospital of Medicine and Dentistry,
Nagasaki, Japan. 3Professor and Chairperson in Division of Cariology,
4Professor and Chairperson; Division of Clinical Physiology, Nagasaki
University, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the usefulness of inhalation sedation
(IS) and intravenous (IV) sedation for gag reflex management in
patients undergoing endodontic therapy.
Design: Twelve cases (five mandibular molars, two maxillary
and two mandibular premolars, one maxillary canine and two maxillary
incisors) of five retching, male patients were studied. Management
techniques, complications during treatment, and the characteristics
of the root canal obturation were surveyed. The postoperative discomfort
was also examined every month for four months up to two years after
root canal filling. Results: Two patients each underwent
IS and IV sedation, and both management techniques were employed
in the other patient. Endodontic treatment was completed without
respiratory distress, nausea, vomiting or other complications. Radiographs
indicated that the root canals were filled up to 0.5-2mm on the
inner portion from the apex in 10 of 12 teeth, although the curved
root canals of two mandibular molars showed unfilled space between
the ledge and apex. After root canal filling, no postoperative pain
/ swelling or other discomfort was observed throughout the observation
periods.
Conclusion: IS and IV sedation were useful management techniques
that facilitated endodontic therapy for problematic gag reflex patients
who could not tolerate therapy by behaviour modification.
Locked-in syndrome: A case report
Sharon Andrea Corinne Liberali BDS (Adel.), Grad Dip Clin Dent
(Adel.)
Special Needs Unit, Adelaide Dental Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
Abstract
A 33 year old female with a history of a brain stem abscess in 1992
resulting in flaccid quadriplegia, but no residual cognitive deficit,
was rendered edentulous in 2006. Dental treatment was complicated
by the fact that the patient has 'locked-in syndrome' with her only
means of communication via the eye-blink method.
JDOH home
BSDH home
|